2025 Track & Field Team Rankings: Week 10
- Carson Vittorio
- Apr 17
- 2 min read

Scoring differences between conference and state meets can significantly impact how a team performs at each level. Here’s why:
Depth vs. Star Power – In conference meets, team depth often plays a bigger role because points are spread across multiple places (e.g., 8 places in a standard meet). A team with many solid athletes can accumulate points even if they don’t have event winners. At state meets, however, scoring is often weighted more toward top finishers, meaning teams with a few elite athletes who place high or win events can score big, even if they lack overall depth.
Event Specialization – At the state level, athletes may focus on fewer events to maximize performance. At conference meets, athletes might compete in multiple events to help the team score more points, potentially leading to fatigue. At state, where fewer athletes can qualify per event, teams with highly specialized, top-tier athletes often thrive.
Scoring Distribution – In a conference meet, with fewer teams, mid-level finishes can still contribute solid points. At a state meet, with many more teams, placing in the middle doesn’t contribute much, making individual victories and high placements more critical.
Point Concentration – In some states, the number of scoring places at the state meet is lower than at the conference level (e.g., top 8 vs. top 16), making it harder for teams reliant on depth to score as much. A team that dominated a conference meet with many second- and third-place finishes may struggle if those performances don't score at state.
Relays & Team Strategy – Some teams score big in relays at the conference level, but at state, the competition is tougher, and relay depth might not be as effective. Likewise, some schools may shift athletes into relays at state to maximize points instead of spreading them across individual events.
Ultimately, teams that rely on depth tend to perform better at conference meets, while teams with elite athletes who place high in individual events often excel at state.
3A Boys
Chicago (Kenwood)
Belleville West
New Lenox (Lincoln-Way West)
Winnetka (New Trier)
Oak Park-River Forest
Belleville East
Downers Grove North
Algonquin (Jacobs)
Plainfield North
Edwardsville
3A Girls
Homewood-Flossmoor
Mt. Prospect (Prospect)
Chicago (Whitney Young)
Edwardsville
Plainfield North
Chicago (St. Ignatius)
Huntley
Kankakee
Belleville East
Frankfort (Lincoln-Way East)
2A Boys
Morton
Mascoutah
Cahokia
Sycamore
East St. Louis
Chicago (Payton)
Benton
Marion
Olney (Richland County)
Glen Ellyn (Glenbard South)
2A Girls
Normal University
Chicago (South Shore)
Troy (Triad)
Wheaton (St. Francis)
Chicago (DePaul)
East St. Louis
Mt. Zion
Springfield (Sacred Heart Griffin)
Mahomet-Seymour
Tolono Unity
1A Boys
Bloomington Central Catholic
Pleasant Plains
Morrison
Tuscola
Colfax (Ridgeview)
Rockford Christian
Altamont
Lena-Winslow
Delavan
Shelbyville
1A Girls
El Paso-Gridley
Glen Carbon (Father McGivney)
Tuscola
Effingham (St. Anthony)
Maroa-Forsyth
Henry-Senachwine
Oregon
Pleasant Plains
Newton
Shelbyville
Comments